An SEO audit is worth paying for when it changes what your team does next week. Most do not: they arrive as a 90-page export of every warning a crawler can generate, ranked by severity rather than by money, and they get filed. Ours is built backwards from the fix list, every finding attached to the pages and the revenue it affects, and a sequence your developers and writers can actually work through.
What you get, and what it costs
You get a prioritised action plan: what is wrong, what it is costing you, what to do about it, and in what order. Not a warnings list. Audits are scoped to the brief, because a 300-page brochure site and a 300,000-URL catalogue are not the same job, and you get a fixed price before we start. If you want the automated first pass now and for free, run our SEO audit tool.
What the audit covers
Every manual audit works through the same ground, adjusted for what your site actually needs. Nothing here is billed separately, and this is not a warnings export. Each item is checked, explained, and tied to the action plan that follows.
Crawl and indexation
What your site publishes reconciled against what Google has actually indexed. Robots.txt and meta robots directives, noindex left on after a launch, canonical conflicts, soft 404s, orphaned pages, redirect chains and loops, XML sitemap accuracy, parameter and faceted URLs consuming crawl budget, and, where server logs are available, what Googlebot really requested.
Site architecture and internal linking
Click depth from the homepage, the shape of the category tree, breadcrumb consistency, anchor text distribution, and which commercially important pages receive no internal links at all. On established sites this is routinely the highest-return area, because the authority is already on the domain and simply isn’t reaching the right templates.
On-page and content quality
Title and meta patterns by template, heading hierarchy, keyword cannibalisation between pages competing for the same term, thin and duplicate content at scale, pages with impressions but no clicks, decaying pages that used to perform, and content gaps against what your priority terms actually require to rank.
Technical: speed, rendering, canonicals and structured data
Core Web Vitals from field data in the Chrome UX Report rather than lab scores alone, diagnosed by template so one fix repairs thousands of URLs. Render-blocking resources, image delivery, mobile parity, and raw HTML compared against the rendered DOM to find content that only exists after client-side JavaScript. Canonical tags checked for conflicts and self-reference errors, and hreflang mapped and validated across markets. On structured data: what schema types are present, whether they validate, and whether required properties are missing. We check and fix descriptive markup (Organization, Article, BreadcrumbList) but we do not add FAQPage, HowTo, Product, Offer, Review or AggregateRating schema; if a competitor is showing rich results from one of those types, we’ll explain the tradeoff rather than add markup that misrepresents the page.
Backlink profile
Referring domain quality and growth, the gap between your profile and the sites outranking you, anchor text distribution, toxic and paid-link exposure, and unlinked brand mentions worth reclaiming.
Local and Google Business Profile
For sites with a physical location or service area: Google Business Profile completeness and category accuracy, NAP consistency across the web, local pack visibility for priority terms, and review volume against the competitors occupying the map pack. Not part of the audit where the business has no local intent to serve.
AI and assistant visibility
A baseline read on whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot name you or your competitors, run using a fixed set of test prompts against your commercial terms. Alongside that: whether your pages are answer-shaped, whether your entity facts are consistent enough for a model to resolve, and whether important content survives without JavaScript. Included in the standard audit at no extra cost, not sold as an upsell.
Analytics and tracking integrity
Whether GA4 and Search Console are measuring what you think they are: goal and conversion configuration, duplicate or missing tags, cross-domain tracking on multi-subdomain setups, sampling and data-gap checks, and consent-mode impact on the numbers you’re deciding from. A finding that looks like a traffic problem is sometimes a measurement problem, and we check which before recommending a fix.
The output
Everything above feeds one prioritised action plan, ordered by likely commercial impact against implementation effort, not a list of everything that was looked at. See “What the deliverable looks like” below for what you actually receive.
The three audit levels
Free automated. Our SEO audit tool analyses a URL for Core Web Vitals, page speed, on-page elements and technical health, and returns a prioritised issue list with severity levels. No sign-up, no cost, and no sales call attached. It is genuinely useful and it has a ceiling: it tests pages, not templates, and it cannot read your logs, judge intent, or weigh a finding against the revenue behind the page.
Standard. The full manual audit for a single site and a single market, delivered as the action plan described below, with a working session to hand it over. This is the right purchase for most sites under about 10,000 URLs. Scoped to the brief, fixed price before we start.
Enterprise. Multi-market, multi-domain or very large catalogues, adding log-file analysis, template-level diagnosis across thousands of URLs, hreflang cluster validation, and a governance plan for getting fixes through a roadmap you do not control. Also scoped to the brief: site size, platform, log availability and property count set the price, not a tier name.
What the deliverable looks like
A single prioritised action plan, ordered by likely commercial impact against implementation effort, with the reasoning shown so the ordering is arguable rather than asserted. Every finding carries four things: the affected templates and a sample of URLs, the traffic or revenue currently attached to them, the specific change required, and how to verify it once shipped.
Underneath sit dev-ready tickets with acceptance criteria: not “improve site speed” but the template, the cause, the change and the target. A competitor comparison covering the sites outranking you on your priority terms. And a baseline tracking sheet captured on day one, so three months later there is a factual answer to whether the work paid for itself.
Proof
SITU LIVE is the clearest case for auditing before doing anything else. The site could not be crawled properly, so no page could rank regardless of its content. The audit found the barriers, the fixes were sequenced ahead of all other work, and the result was a 63% increase in enquiries, a 74% increase in organic traffic and an 84% increase in non-brand organic.
Venner Shipley shows the same discipline on a professional services site: on-site optimisation, structural fixes and migration oversight run as one programme, producing 48% year-on-year organic visibility growth, a 37% traffic increase and 58% growth in non-brand organic.
Amulet started with no measurable organic presence at all. Audit-led foundations delivered a 123%+ year-on-year increase in organic traffic and a 437% increase in search visibility.
Free SEO audit tool
Start here. Our website SEO audit checks any URL for Core Web Vitals, page speed, on-page elements and technical health, and returns a prioritised list of issues with severity levels. It is free, needs no sign-up, and is the same first pass we run before a manual audit. Pair it with our schema markup report to see which rich results your pages qualify for and which required properties are missing, and our GEO visibility score for a first read on how AI assistants describe your brand.
Run them first. If the output raises more questions than it answers (and on any site of real size it will, because the interesting problems are template-level) that is the point at which a manual audit earns its fee.
What happens after the audit
An audit nobody implements is a receipt, not an investment. So the handover is a working session with the people who will do the work, not an emailed PDF, and we agree what goes into the next sprint before we leave. From there you can take the plan in-house, or we implement inside a retainer from £1,250 a month ex VAT, where fixes get shipped, verified and re-measured. Tell us which you want.
Latest SEO Insights
Stay ahead with our expert content
SEO Audit Checklist: 40 Checks to Run in 2026
An SEO audit checks four things in order: whether Google can crawl the site, whether it indexes the right pages, whether those pages answer…
How to Choose an SEO Agency: A 10-Point Checklist
Choose an SEO agency on three things. Whether they diagnosed your site before pitching, whether they can show what they shipped for a comparable…
SEO Agency vs Freelancer vs In-House: Which to Pick
Hire a freelancer when you need one specialism and have someone in-house to implement. Hire an agency when you need several specialisms at once…
How Much Does SEO Cost in the UK? 2026 Pricing Guide
Most UK businesses pay between £500 and £5,000 a month for SEO, and the single most common commercial arrangement is a monthly retainer rather…
Frequently asked questions
Roughly three weeks from access to handover on a typical site: discovery and crawling in the first few days, analysis in the second week, prioritisation and ticket writing in the third, then a working session with your team. Large catalogues, multi-market sites and log-file analysis take longer, and we tell you that when we scope rather than after we start.
It is scoped to the brief and quoted as a fixed price before any work begins. The variables that move it are site size, platform, whether server logs are available, and how many markets or subdomains are in scope. The automated first pass through our free audit tool costs nothing, and for smaller sites it may be all you need this quarter.
Either. The audit is sold as a diagnosis and works as a standalone purchase. Plenty of clients have capable in-house teams and only need to know what to do. Where you want it implemented, that happens inside a retainer, and we will review your team’s implementation for free within the first few months in any case, because an audit whose fixes went in wrong reflects on us.
Ours is, within limits, and we will be plain about them. An automated tool tests a page against known rules and finds real problems: missing titles, failing Core Web Vitals, broken markup. What it cannot do is decide which of those problems is costing you money, spot that 40,000 URLs share one template defect, read your server logs, or notice that two of your pages are competing for the same term. Free audits from agencies that require your phone number before showing results are usually a lead form with a report attached; ours does not ask.
A full audit annually is right for most sites, with a lighter review after any significant change: a replatform, a redesign, a major content migration, or a ranking drop you cannot explain. Sites that ship frequently benefit from continuous monitoring inside a retainer instead, because an annual snapshot of a site that changes weekly is out of date by the time it is delivered.
A technical audit answers whether search engines can crawl, render, understand and trust your site. A full SEO audit includes that and adds keyword targeting, content quality, cannibalisation, off-site authority and AI visibility. If you already know your problem is technical, the narrower job is cheaper. If you do not know where the loss is coming from, the broader one finds it.
Usually, yes. That is one of the most common reasons clients buy one. The work is separating the candidates: an algorithm update, a technical change your own team shipped, a migration that lost redirects, seasonality, a competitor’s gains, or a reporting artefact such as a tracking change. We check the timing against known update dates and against your own release history before concluding anything, because “it was an update” is the most over-used and least examined explanation in this industry.
Yes. We run campaigns for UK, Irish and Australian markets, and international auditing (hreflang cluster validation, market-level indexing, duplicate content across territories and search behaviour that differs by country) is a routine part of the work rather than an exception.
GET IN TOUCH
Ready to grow your brand? Get in touch with our team to discuss how we can help you achieve your goals.